Precipitation trend increases the contribution of dry reduced nitrogen deposition

Jan 27, 2024

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science volume 6, Article number: 62 (2023) Cite this article

108 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

Given the leveling off in oxidized nitrogen emissions around the world, the atmospheric deposition of reduced nitrogen (NHx = NH3 + NH4+) has become progressively critical, especially dry deposition, which presents great threats to plant growth. A combination of historical deposition data of measured wet NHx and modeled dry NHx in China suggests that dry NHx deposition has been increasing substantially (4.50% yr−1, p < 0.05) since 1980. Here, chemical transport model (WRF-EMEP) results indicate that variation in NH3 emissions is not a dominant factor resulting in the continually increasing trends of dry NHx deposition, while climate change-induced trends in precipitation patterns with less frequent light rain and more frequent consecutive rain events (with ≥2 consecutive rainy days) contribute to the increase in dry NHx deposition. This will continue to shift NHx deposition from wet to dry form at a rate of 0.12 and 0.23% yr−1 (p < 0.05) for the period of 2030–2100 in China under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively. Further analysis for North America and Europe demonstrates results similar to China, with a consistent increase in the contribution of dry NHx deposition driven by changing precipitation patterns from ~30% to ~35%. Our findings, therefore, uncover the change of precipitation patterns has an increasing influence on the shifting of NHx deposition from wet to dry form in the Northern Hemisphere and highlight the need to shift from total NHx deposition-based control strategies to more stringent NH3 emission controls targeting dry NHx deposition in order to mitigate the potential negative ecological impacts.

Nitrogen deposition, an important component of the global nitrogen cycle, has increased twofold over the past 100 years globally1 and by 60% from 1980 to 2010 in China2, as a result of reactive nitrogen emissions associated with rapid expansion in agriculture and increased fossil fuel combustion3. These reactive nitrogen species include reduced (NHx = NH3 + NH4+) and oxidized (NOy = NOx (NO + NO2) + its oxidation products) compounds. Given the continual reductions in NOx emissions, NHx deposition has become increasingly important, with its contribution currently reaching 60–85% of the total nitrogen deposition in the United States and Europe4,5,6. Enhanced NHx deposition is favorable for crop production and plant growth in nitrogen-limited regions7, whereas excess NHx deposition causes greater damage to nitrogen-sensitive ecosystems, including global biodiversity loss and eutrophication, compared with NOy deposition8.

The removal of NHx from the atmosphere can occur by dry or wet processes1,9,10. Wet deposition occurs mainly through scavenging by rainfall, sleet, fog, snow, and hail2,11, while dry deposition occurs by vertical turbulent transfer to the earth's surface8,9. Dry NHx deposition (often dominated by gaseous NH3) is a continuous process that drives plant species composition change and reduces species cover and diversity much faster, and inflicts greater threats to plant growth compared to the same unit of wet NHx deposition12,13. Previous studies have characterized the spatiotemporal variation and ecological effects of NHx deposition; however, the main focus of these studies has been on wet NHx deposition because it is relatively easy to measure in existing networks2,11, whereas long-term and large-scale dry NHx deposition has been less studied due to the technical difficulty in directly measuring and monitoring dry deposition. It has been reported that dry NHx deposition has been a critical component of total NHx deposition in recent years14,15. Based on a combination of historical measurement-based wet NHx deposition and model-based dry NHx deposition data, Yu et al.16 suggested that there has been a shift in the relative contributions of wet and dry deposition to total NHx deposition in China from 1980 to 2015; wet deposition previously dominated total NHx deposition, but the modeled ratio of dry to wet NHx deposition (\({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\)) gradually rose from 1980 to 2015, to the point where wet and dry deposition now have an approximately equal contribution to total NHx deposition (Fig. 1). Thus, there is an urgent need to better understand why dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) have increased in China during the past decades according to the modeled deposition, especially when NH3 emissions have remained stable since 200516.

a Deposition flux (kg N ha−1 yr−1) and the ratio of dry to wet NHx deposition (\({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\)). b Anthropogenic emissions of SO2, NOx, and NH3 (Tg yr−1) (data obtained from Yu et al.16); circles represent the average modeled dry deposition, measured wet deposition, total deposition (dry + wet), and emissions for a given time period; the dashed lines are a linear fit to the points; gray bars are \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) and are plotted on the right-hand axis; error bars indicate standard deviation (s.d.).

The major factors that control the variation of NHx deposition include emissions, meteorology, and land cover9,17,18. Chemical transport models (CTMs) have been widely used to investigate the relative impact of these factors on nitrogen deposition. The results suggest that the long-term trends of NHx deposition depend to a large extent on emissions and meteorology on regional and global scales, while land use and land cover are important for the spatial distribution of NHx deposition19,20,21,22. Specifically, variations in meteorological variables (e.g., precipitation, surface air temperature, wind speed, solar radiation, and atmospheric stability) driven by global climate change are closely related to the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition, although they play only a minor role (less than 20%) in controlling the long-term trends of total nitrogen deposition19,20,21,22. Precipitation, in particular, controls the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition due to its role in the wet scavenging process. Regardless of the importance of precipitation amount in the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition18,23, regional and global annual precipitation amounts have not shown a statistically significant trend in the past decades24 and accordingly cannot explain the decadal-scale variation of the modeled partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition. Precipitation patterns (e.g., occurrence, intensity, and duration), however, have changed significantly around the world. Specifically, extreme and consecutive rain events have intensified in the past 100 years25,26 and are projected to intensify further in the future around the world27,28. The change in the precipitation patterns can be mainly attributed to the increased moisture in the atmosphere due to global warming and persistent low pressure due to the slowing of atmospheric circulation29,30. Nevertheless, the influence of changing precipitation patterns on the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition remains poorly understood19,20,23,31,32,33.

In this work, we address the following questions: how do the variations in climate change-induced precipitation patterns contribute to the continual increase in dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) in China15 ? Is the importance of climate change-induced precipitation patterns for the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition specific to China, or is it a ubiquitous phenomenon that also occurs in other regions worldwide? We first establish a linear emission-deposition response relationship based on CTM (WRF-EMEP) simulations to estimate the contribution of precursor emission variation to the change in dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\). The change in dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\), which cannot be explained by precursor emissions, suggests the effect of the interdecadal variability of precipitation patterns driven by climate change. We further explore the potential impact of future climate change on the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition by relying on prediction equations established through historical data and predicted data under two future climate change scenarios, representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5, for the period of 2030–2100. Finally, we broaden our analysis to include the United States (USA) and Europe, the other two hotspots of NHx deposition, to assess the universality of the increasing importance of dry NHx deposition. The purpose of this study is to advance our understanding of the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition driven by global climate change to date and in the future, which will have important implications for assessing ecological impacts and formulating policy to reduce NH3 emissions in the face of climate change.

Historical NHx deposition data based on a combination of measured wet NHx deposition and modeled dry NHx deposition15 (see "Methods" section for detailed information regarding data sources and methodology) for the period of 1980–2015 indicate that the total NHx deposition in China increased considerably at the rate of 0.188 kg N ha−1 yr−2 (1.77% yr−1, p < 0.05) before 2005 and showed a slight decreasing trend (0.112 kg N ha−1 yr−2, 0.80% yr−1) after 2005 (Fig. 1). On average, the total NHx deposition was estimated at 12.7 ± 1.1 kg N ha−1 yr−1 in China from 1980 to 2015. In general, the variation in total NHx deposition was consistent and in line with the trends of NH3 emissions, with a significant positive correlation observed between them (r = 0.95, p < 0.05).

With respect to the forms of NHx deposition, variation in wet NHx deposition was consistent with total NHx deposition, but the growth rate for wet NHx deposition (0.055 kg N ha−1 yr−2, 0.74% yr−1) was lower than that of total NHx deposition before 2005, while the corresponding rate of decrease (0.258 kg N ha−1 yr−2, 3.07% yr−1) was relatively higher after 2005. In contrast, modeled dry NHx deposition was on the rise during the study period, at the rate of 0.143 kg N ha−1 yr−2 (4.50% yr−1, p < 0.05), leading to an upward trend for modeled \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) (ratio of dry to wet NHx deposition) at the rate of 0.026 per year (6.21% yr−1, p < 0.05). These results indicate a shift in the relative contributions of wet and dry deposition to total NHx deposition, with modeled \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) increasing from 0.42 (1980s) to 1.20 (2010s), implying that China has gone from having wet deposition as the dominant contributor to total NHx deposition to having approximately equal dry and wet NHx deposition for the last two decades.

The dry deposition flux is calculated as the product of ambient concentration and vertical deposition velocity (\({V}_{d}\))5 (see detailed information in Supplementary Note 1); ambient concentration depends heavily on precursor emissions while \({V}_{d}\) relies heavily on meteorological conditions, surface characteristics, and the pollution regime34,35,36. The parameterization of gaseous \({V}_{d}\) utilizes a resistance approach analogous to Ohm's law in electrical circuits34,35,36 (see detailed information in Supplementary Note 1). The resistance includes aerodynamic resistance (\({R}_{a}\)), quasi-laminar sublayer resistance (\({R}_{b}\)) and canopy resistance (\({R}_{c}\)), among which, \({R}_{c}\) is generally the most dynamic and difficult to estimate37,38,39,40. Furthermore, \({R}_{c}\) is dominant in the deposition process as it is typically the largest in magnitude among the three resistances40. Non-stomatal resistance (\({R}_{{ns}}\)) is one of the most important terms of \({R}_{c}\) for gaseous NH3 \({V}_{d}\) since non-stomatal uptake is the dominant pathway for highly water-soluble gaseous NH337,38. \({R}_{{ns}}\), is mostly influenced by surface temperature, relative humidity, and the presence of other trace substances (i.e., SO2 and NH3)38,39. According to the work of Simpson et al.39, \({R}_{{ns}}\) was calculated in this study (see Supplementary Eqs. (3 and 4)). Stomatal resistance, \({R}_{{ns}}\), did not change significantly during the study period (Supplementary Fig. 1), although surface temperature (Supplementary Fig. 2) and precursor emissions (Fig. 1b) changed substantially in the past few decades. Further evidence provided by the WRF-EMEP model also revealed that the annual average \({V}_{d}\) for gaseous NH3 and particulate NH4+ had no obvious change between 2010 and 2017 (Supplementary Fig. 3, see detailed information in Supplementary Note 5). The results suggest that \({V}_{d}\) affected by anthropogenic emissions and meteorology was not responsible for the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition.

Among the precursor emissions, NH3 emissions are the primary driver determining the magnitude and trends of NHx deposition. On the other hand, emissions of the acidic gases SO2 and NOx can affect the equilibrium between gaseous NH3 and particulate NH4+ through the variation of aerosol acidity. The variation in aerosol acidity can, in turn, influence the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition11,14. In order to quantify the contribution of variations in precursor emissions to the change in modeled dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\), we first establish a linear emission–deposition response relationship based on CTM (WRF-EMEP) simulations (see "Methods" section for detailed information). As a result, we estimated that the changes in precursor emission amounts during 1985–2015, with values of +5.4 (+73% yr−1), +10.3 (+62% yr−1), and +13.2 (298% yr−1) Tg yr−1 for NH3, SO2, and NOx, respectively, resulted in changes of +1.00 kg N ha−1 yr−1 and +0.03 for the variation in modeled dry NHx deposition (ΔDry) and modeled \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) (ΔRatio), respectively. To summarize, changes in precursor emissions explained 26% of the increase in modeled dry NHx deposition and 4% of the increase in modeled \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\), with an overall variation of +3.85 kg N ha−1 yr−1 and +0.78 for ΔDry and ΔRatio, respectively, suggesting that variation in anthropogenic emissions is not a dominant factor affecting the partition of dry and wet NHx deposition from the perspective of long-term trends. This finding is also confirmed by the spatial analysis of NHx deposition (Supplementary Fig. 4) and anthropogenic emissions (Supplementary Fig. 5), which corroborate the finding from the temporal analysis that variation in anthropogenic emission is not a dominant factor affecting the partition of dry and wet NHx deposition (Supplementary Note 3).

It is widely accepted that precipitation amount is the most important meteorological factor affecting the magnitude of NHx deposition flux18,41. However, there has been no significant variation in the long-term annual accumulated precipitation amount in China during the past few decades, with an average value of 1009–1047 mm yr−1 (Supplementary Fig. 6a). In addition, there has been no statistically significant correlation between precipitation amount and modeled dry NHx deposition, modeled \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\), suggesting that interdecadal variability in precipitation amount is not sufficient to explain the upward trends in modeled dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\). However, precipitation patterns (e.g., intensity and duration) have changed significantly around the world despite stable precipitation amounts. In order to characterize rain intensity and rain event duration quantitatively, rain intensity was classified as light rain (0.1–10 mm d−1) and moderate rain or above (≥10 mm d−1). Based on rainfall duration, a rain event was classified as a consecutive rain event (with two or more consecutive rainy days) or a single rain event.

As shown in Supplementary Fig. 6b, c, the frequency of light rain decreased significantly while upward trends were observed for consecutive rain events in China during 1985–2015 under the effect of climate change. Moreover, the frequency of light rain was negatively correlated with modeled dry NHx deposition (r = −0.73) and modeled \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) (r = −0.90), and the occurrence of consecutive rain events was positively correlated with modeled dry NHx deposition (r = 0.55) and modeled \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) (r = 0.70), indicating that rain intensity and rain event duration may be responsible for the upward trends in modeled dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) in China.

Previous studies have revealed that owing to global climate change, variation in precipitation patterns plays a more important role than the amount of rain in the removal of air pollutants42,43. In terms of rain intensity, it has been theoretically and empirically proven that pollutant concentration in rainwater has a negative correlation with rainfall intensity and that light rain is the most effective at removing water-soluble pollutants through below-cloud scavenging processes44,45,46,47,48,49. Wang et al.50 further demonstrated that aerosol wet scavenging on a global scale is predominantly constrained by light rain and that the magnitude of scavenging varies approximately exponentially with precipitation intensity. To verify the relationship between the wet removal of NH4+ and rain intensity, the concentration of NH4+ in rainfall and the rain intensity was analyzed with data across China, the USA, and Europe. Results showed an exponential relationship between the two parameters, with r-squared values above 0.80 and p-values less than 0.001 (Supplementary Fig. 7, see Supplementary Note 2.1 for data sources), providing additional evidence that light rain has a stronger washout capacity for NH4+ globally. With respect to rain event duration, the washout amount of NH4+ from the atmosphere by consecutive rain events is less than that by an equivalent amount of inconsecutive rain events. This is because as a rain event continues, less NHx content is removed from the atmosphere due to less available NH3 in the atmosphere. NH3 is less available because of suppressed NH3 emissions during the rainfall process and less accumulated NH3 due to washout in the previous time period51. As an example, the dynamics of NH4+ concentrations recorded during two consecutive rain events on April 11th, 2009, in Guiyang, China, revealed that NH4+ was scavenged quickly at the start of each precipitation event, followed by a relatively low level of scavenging until the end of the event41 (Supplementary Fig. 8).

In order to characterize the precipitation pattern-induced effect on the below-cloud wet removal of NHx content with the co-influence of rain intensity and rain event duration, we have defined a new indicator, the precipitation scavenging index (PSI), in this study. The PSI is calculated as follows:

Where LR represents the frequency of days with light rain each year, and CR represents the occurrence of consecutive rain events each year. PSI is, therefore, a dimensionless indicator. A lower value of PSI suggests that less frequent but increasingly intense rainfall events are less efficient at "cleaning" the atmosphere of gaseous NH3 and particulate NH4+. This implies that more NHx remains in the atmosphere for dry deposition by turbulent diffusion to vegetation and other surfaces. This indicator, despite not having a specific physical meaning, provides a simple way to reflect the negative correlation between LR and dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\), as well as the positive correlation between CR and dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\), and comprehensively represents the contrasting effect of LR and CR on the below-cloud wet removal of NHx.

An overall negative trend was found for PSI in China during 1980–2015 (Fig. 2). The negative correlations were found between PSI and modeled dry NHx deposition (r = −0.79) as well as modeled \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) (r = −0.63), indicating that variation in climate change-induced precipitation patterns favor a shift in NHx deposition from the wet to dry form. Spatial analysis of NHx deposition (Supplementary Fig. 4) and precipitation patterns (Supplementary Fig. 9) in China further confirmed that changing precipitation patterns contributed to the increase in dry NHx deposition in China (Supplementary Note 3). Our finding is supported by studies conducted in the USA, which also revealed that most of the increases in ambient NH3 concentration are a manifestation of climate change52,53.

Predicted PSI was calculated by using the meteorological parameters from the two global future climate change scenarios RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5. Error bars indicate 1/3 standard deviation (s.d.).

As global climate change is accelerating, partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition driven by precipitation pattern changes is expected to continue in the future. The results from the two future global climate scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) show that less frequent light rain and more consecutive rain events are expected for the period of 2030–2100 (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c). Therefore, the PSI will continue to decline in the future (Fig. 2), implying that more NHx remains in the atmosphere and can subsequently be removed from the atmosphere via dry deposition processes. Further reductions in anthropogenic SO2 and NOx emissions, and a steady increase in NH3 emissions, are projected from 2030 to 2100 under these global climate scenarios (Supplementary Fig. 10). Hence, the projected \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\), as a function of the emission index (EI) and PSI (see detailed information in Supplementary Note 6), will continue to increase between 2030 and 2100 at a rate of 0.007 per year (0.59% yr−1, p < 0.05) and 0.010 per year (1.13% yr−1, p < 0.05) for the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively (Fig. 3a). As a result, modeled dry NHx deposition shows increasing trends at a rate of 0.011 kg N ha−1 yr−2 (0.16% yr−1, p < 0.05) for RCP4.5 and 0.020 kg N ha−1 yr−2 (0.30% yr−1, p < 0.05) for RCP8.5, respectively (Fig. 3b). Accordingly, based on the projected dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\), we extrapolated that wet NHx deposition shows a continuing downward trend (Fig. 3c), while the total NHx deposition remains stable since NH3 emissions remain constant (Fig. 3d). Even though the total NHx deposition remains almost stable at around 12–13 kg N ha−1 yr−1 in the future, the threats to natural ecosystems from NHx deposition are expected to increase in the future since the projected increase in dry NHx deposition could lead to greater damage to plant growth as compared to a similar amount of wet NHx deposition12,13. Meanwhile, the shifting of the partitioning of NHx deposition will also affect the air quality16,54,55. This is because the shifting of the partitioning of NHx deposition from the particulate phase to the gaseous phase would decrease particle pollution to some extent54. However, the shifting of the partitioning of NHx deposition would increase the lifetime of NHx, and this can facilitate long-range transportation of NHx, which may affect other regions55.

a \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\); b dry deposition; c wet deposition; d total deposition.

In light of the importance of dry NHx deposition to the nitrogen cycle and the associated ecological effects, we broaden our analysis to historical NHx deposition data in the USA and Europe, which are recognized as additional hotspots of NHx deposition (see more details in Supplementary Note 2.1 and Supplementary Note 4). Consistent upward trends for modeled \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) also occur in the USA and Europe, irrespective of changes in total, wet, and dry deposition of NHx (Supplementary Fig. 11). Specifically, modeled \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) increased at a rate of 0.010 per year (2.05% yr−1, p < 0.05) in the USA and 0.005 per year (1.19% yr−1, p < 0.05) in Europe. Although wet deposition remained the dominant mechanism for NHx removal in the USA and Europe, the contribution of modeled dry NHx deposition to total NHx deposition increased in the past two decades, from ~30% to ~35% for both the USA and Europe. Similar to the estimation in China, we extrapolate that precipitation pattern variations driven by climate change offset the effect of stable or decreasing NH3 emissions and increase the contribution of modeled dry NHx deposition to total NHx deposition in the USA and Europe (see detailed information in Supplementary Note 4).

The results from the two additional continents further suggest the widespread and growing importance of dry NHx deposition driven by precipitation patterns resulting from global climate change. This is in contrast with previous studies that suggest relatively little influence of climate change, which may partly be because they only considered changes in precipitation amount, whereas we show that precipitation patterns (intensity and duration) play a far more important role in the shifting of NHx deposition partitioning19,20,21,22. Figure 4 schematically illustrates how NHx deposition partitioning shifts under the influence of climate change-induced variations in precipitation patterns. In view of the acceleration of global climate change, less frequent light rain and more frequent consecutive rain events are expected at present and in the coming decades. In particular, extreme rain events are projected to become more frequent in the future, which will further strengthen the shifting of NHx deposition from the wet to the dry form. Consequently, relatively less NHx content will be removed from the atmosphere via wet deposition, resulting in a continued increase in the contribution of dry NHx deposition, which will have a series of side effects on natural ecosystems and human health and air quality12,54,56. More importantly, other extreme weather events (e.g., drought and heatwave) due to global climate change will weaken the growth of plants and increase their susceptibility to increased dry NHx deposition in the future57.

Atmospheric reduced nitrogen (NHx) is emitted in the form of NH3 to a large extent by agricultural activities (nitrogen fertilizer application and livestock manure) and then deposited back to the earth's surface via dry and wet removal pathways. NH3 emissions, in combination with emissions of the acidic gases SO2 and NOx, can influence the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition by affecting the equilibrium between gaseous NH3 and particulate NH4+11,18. More importantly, as a consequence of climate change, global trends in precipitation patterns, in particular trends toward less frequent light rain and more frequent consecutive rain events, shift the partitioning of the dry and wet deposited NHx fractions. Specifically, this leads to a decrease in wet deposition and an increase in dry deposition, leading to negative ecological consequences since the continued increasing dry NHx deposition causes greater damage to plant growth as compared to the same unit of wet NHx deposition12,13.

Note that changes in NHx deposition can reflect the tendency of total nitrogen deposition to a certain extent, although we focus only on the partitioning of dry and wet NHx deposition in this study without analyzing NOy deposition. For example, the increasing importance of NHx deposition compared with NOy deposition can be inferred based on the combination of historically measured wet nitrogen deposition and modeled dry nitrogen deposition data shown in Yu et al.16. Looking to the future, NHx deposition will dominate total nitrogen deposition after 2030, as NH3 emissions are expected to surpass NOx emissions at that time (Supplementary Fig. 10), suggesting that the role of NHx deposition in nitrogen deposition will become more prominent, especially with the continued strict control of NOx emissions. Lamarque et al.58 also reported that nitrogen deposition was projected to increase over certain regions around the world by the end of the 21st century, especially in Asia, owing to the projected increase in NH3 emissions. Consequently, NH3 emission control is still the most effective and fundamental way to reduce NHx deposition and to curb its damage to natural ecosystems and human health, although NH3 emission abatement cannot fully control NHx deposition as previous studies documented that per-unit reduction in NH3 emissions led to only a 60–80% mitigation of NHx deposition10,59. Nevertheless, the analysis in the USA and Europe also highlights that the expected benefits from NH3 emission reductions on dry NHx deposition are diminished by the effects of climate change. Hence, more stringent NH3 emission controls are required to achieve the desired reductions in NHx deposition levels in the future20. A significant proportion of the NH3 emissions in China can be attributed to its agricultural sources, and improving agricultural nitrogen management (e.g., reduced fertilizer application, covered manure storage, and implementation of the deep application of fertilizers during growing seasons) could be the most effective approach to reduce NH3 emissions from agricultural sources in China to date and in the future54,60,61.

This study prompts our re-examination of the significance of dry NHx deposition in the global nitrogen cycle and ecosystem assessment and poses an urgent need to mitigate NHx deposition in the face of global climate change. Nevertheless, this study is still subject to four major uncertainties and limitations (see more information in Supplementary Note 7): (1) Long-term trends of dry NHx deposition are modeled results, which entail a higher degree of uncertainty than the observed wet NHx deposition11,62,63. Deposition velocity (\({V}_{d}\)) is the dominant contributor to the uncertainty of dry deposition simulations and could potentially affect the estimation of dry NHx deposition flux34,35,36. However, year-specific instead of time-varying \({V}_{d}\) was used to estimate long-term trends of dry NHx deposition in this study, which could introduce additional uncertainties. (2) The historical NH3 emissions data were calculated based on bottom-up activity data and static emissions factors, which did not consider the effect of interannual meteorological variability64,65,66,67. Whereas NH3 emissions were extremely weather/climate-sensitive68, the influence of climate change-induced precipitation patterns and other meteorological factors (e.g., temperature and wind speed) are supposed to affect the emission processes of NH3, which might also introduce additional uncertainties. (3) The land/atmosphere exchange of gaseous NH3 is, in fact, bi-directional and controlled by a range of environmental factors69,70,71. Nonetheless, owing to the difficulty of obtaining detailed input parameters and empirical tuning at a large scale, NH3 bi-directional exchange process has been incorporated into only a few of the regional- and global-scale CTMs (i.e., CMAQ, CAMX, GEM-MACH, and LOTOS-EUROS)35,36,72,73. Therefore, the lack of consideration of bi-directional parameterization schemes simultaneously affects the estimation of NH3 emissions and NHx deposition74,75,76 and introduces additional uncertainties. (4) Apart from precipitation patterns, global climate change can also affect NHx deposition partitioning through other aspects such as surface temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, soil temperature, and natural surface properties68,77,78. However, the complex interactions of multiple meteorological parameters, as opposed to their individual effects on NHx deposition partitioning, make it difficult to isolate and quantify the relative importance of these meteorological parameters. Hence, the quantification of global climate change-induced NHx deposition partitioning is still subject to large uncertainty and remains a great challenge for the whole community. Development of climate-dependent models for better quantification of the dynamic relationship between NH3 emissions, climate/meteorology, and deposition under global environmental change in the future is therefore needed77.

Both the annual modeled dry NHx deposition and measured wet NHx deposition data in China for the period of 1980–2015 were obtained from Yu et al.16, which is the most comprehensive and current data on long-term NHx deposition available in China. General information regarding the sources of the NHx deposition data collected in China has been summarized in Supplementary Table 1. Briefly, observed wet NHx deposition data were obtained from four sources, including (1) peer-reviewed published papers screened by Yu et al.16, (2) the Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (https://www.eanet.asia/, last access: 3 January 2023), (3) the National Ecosystem Research Network of China (http://www.cnern.ac.cn/index.action, last access: 3 January 2023), and (4) the Nationwide Nitrogen Deposition Monitoring Network established by China Agricultural University72, with a total of 956 monitoring sites.

Modeled dry NHx deposition fluxes were obtained from inferential methods, which combine ambient concentrations and dry deposition velocities (see Supplementary Note 1 for the parameterization of dry NH3 deposition)5,79,80. The average land use specific \({V}_{d}\) collected from previous studies was used to calculate annual dry NHx deposition (Supplementary Fig. 12, see Extended Data Table 4 in Yu et al.16). Specifically, modeled \({V}_{d}\) for 9 land use types was derived from Xu et al.11, who applied the GEOS-Chem model coupled with the scheme of Wesely81 and Zhang et al.82 to calculate \({V}_{d}\) for gaseous NH3 and particulate NH4+, respectively. Modeled \({V}_{d}\) in the rest of 5 land use types (i.e., desert, tundra, water, wetland, and ice) was estimated by using similar parameterization schemes used as in Xu et al.11 but with different CTMs (CMAQ, RegAMDS)83,84,85,86,87,88. It is worth noting that the modeled \({V}_{d}\) in the 14 land use types derived from Yu et al.16 was originally based on a unidirectional method, except for Su et al.83, who used a bi-directional NH3 exchange method to calculate \({V}_{d}\) for gaseous NH3 over deserts.

Yu et al.16 averaged the annual NHx deposition during 1980–2015 for 6 periods, including 1980–1990, 1991–1995, 1996–2000, 2001–2005, 2006–2010, and 2011–201515. Hence, we also averaged precursor emissions for the corresponding six periods (see Supplementary Note 2.3 for detailed information regarding emissions data). The data in each period were fitted with the middle year of the corresponding period in order to obtain the linear regressions. Subsequently, the slope of the linear regression was used to represent the average annual rate of change. The relative annual rate of change was then calculated by normalizing the annual rate of change with the value for the first time period in each region.

The response relationship between NHx deposition and precursor emissions was developed based on the WRF-EMEP model (the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the European Monitoring and Evaluation Program)32. Model configuration and evaluation are presented in Supplementary Note 5. A series of sensitivity studies were conducted to quantify the response of NHx deposition to reductions in SO2, NOx, and NH3 separately, as well as SO2 + NOx + NH3 together. The reduction values for individual emissions were set to be 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90%, respectively. Sensitivity results show that the response of regional NHx deposition to individual emission reductions is nearly linear. This is consistent with the study by Civerolo et al.19, which also revealed that the response of global nitrogen deposition to emissions was nearly linear based on six different tropospheric chemistry models. Furthermore, sensitivity results also revealed that the effect of NH3 emission variation is far more important than that of SO2 and NOx emissions, which has also been found by previous studies74,89. Last but not least, the response to the co-reduction of SO2 + NOx + NH3 was nearly equal to the sum of the individual reductions of SO2, NOx, and NH3. Therefore, the total variations in dry NHx deposition (ΔDry) and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) (ΔRatio) caused by precursor emissions during 1980–2015 can be obtained using Eq. (2):

Where \({a}_{1}\), \({a}_{2}\), and \({a}_{3}\) are constants, indicating the variations in dry NHx deposition and \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}x({\rm{dry/wet}})}\) caused by per-unit reduction in SO2, NOx, and NH3 emissions, respectively, as listed in Supplementary Table 2. \({\Delta {\rm{SO}}}_{2}\), \({\Delta {\rm{NO}}}_{x}\), and \({\Delta {\rm{NH}}}_{3}\) are the changes in SO2, NOx, and NH3 emissions between 1980 and 2015, respectively.

All data used in this study are available in the main text or the supplemental materials. Links to download the NHx data (i.e., ambient concentration, precipitation concentration, and deposition flux) can be found in Supplementary Table 1. Links to download historical and predicted anthropogenic emissions data and meteorological data are provided in the Supplementary Note 2.

We performed simulations using WRF v3.9.1 coupled with the EMEP rv4.17 model, which are freely available at https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/ (last access: 3 January 2023) and https://github.com/metno/emep-ctm (last access: 3 January 2023), respectively.

Galloway, J. N. et al. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70, 153–226 (2004).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, X. J. et al. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494, 459–462 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Galloway, J. N. et al. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320, 889–892 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Jiang, Z. et al. Unexpected slowdown of US pollutant emission reduction in the past decade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5099–5104 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Li, Y. et al. Increasing importance of deposition of reduced nitrogen in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5874–5879 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Tomlinson, S. J., Carnell, E. J., Dore, A. J. & Dragosits, U. Nitrogen deposition in the UK at 1 km resolution from 1990 to 2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 4677–4692 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Thomas, R. Q., Canham, C., Weathers, K. C. & Goodale, C. L. Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US. Nat. Geosci. 3, 13–17 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Erisman, J. W. et al. Consequences of human modification of the global nitrogen cycle. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 368, 20130116 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Lamarque, J. F. et al. Assessing future nitrogen deposition and carbon cycle feedback using a multimodel approach: analysis of nitrogen deposition. J. Geophys. Res. 110, D19303 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Tan, J., Fu, J. S. & Seinfeld, J. H. Ammonia emission abatement does not fully control reduced forms of nitrogen deposition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9771–9775 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Xu, W. et al. Quantifying atmospheric nitrogen deposition through a nationwide monitoring network across China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 12345–12360 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Sheppard, L. J. et al. Dry deposition of ammonia gas drives species change faster than wet deposition of ammonium ions: evidence from a long‐term field manipulation. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3589–3607 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Van der Eerden, L. J. M. Toxicity of ammonia to plants. Agric. Environ. 7, 223–235 (1982).

Article Google Scholar

Pan, Y. P. et al. Ammonia should be considered in field experiments mimicking nitrogen deposition. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett. 13, 248–251 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Jia, Y. et al. Spatial and decadal variations in inorganic nitrogen wet deposition in China induced by human activity. Sci. Rep. 4, 3763 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Yu, G. et al. Stabilization of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China over the past decade. Nat. Geosci. 12, 424–429 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Hertel, O. et al. Governing processes for reactive nitrogen compounds in the European atmosphere. Biogeosciences 9, 4921–4954 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Pan, Y. P. et al. Wet and dry deposition of atmospheric nitrogen at ten sites in Northern China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 6515–6535 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Civerolo, K. L. et al. Simted effects of climate change on summertime nitrogen deposition in the eastern US. Atmos. Environ. 42, 2074–2082 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Ellis, R. A. et al. Present and future nitrogen deposition to national parks in the United States: critical load exceedances. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 9083–9095 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, J. et al. Impacts of cli change and emissions on atmospheric oxidized nitrogen deposition over East Asia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 887–900 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Zhao, X. et al. Spatial and temporal variation of inorganic nitrogen wet deposition to the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Water Air Soil Pollut. 203, 277–289 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Sun, Q. et al. A review of global precipitation data sets: data sources, estimation, and intercomparisons. Rev. Geophys. 56, 79–107 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Fischer, E. M. & Knutti, R. Observed heavy precipitation increase confirms theory and early models. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 986–991 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

O’Gorman, P. A. Sensitivity of tropical precipitation extremes to climate change. Nat. Geosci. 5, 697–700 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Palmer, T. N. & Räisänen, J. Quantifying the risk of extreme seasonal precipitation events in a changing climate. Nature 415, 512–514 (2002).

Article Google Scholar

Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., O’Gorman, P. A. & Maher, N. More extreme precipitation in the world's dry and wet regions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 508–513 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Butler, T., Vermeylen, F., Lehmann, C. M., Likens, G. E. & Puchalski, M. Increasing ammonia concentration trends in large regions of the USA derived from the NADP/AMoN network. Atmos. Environ. 146, 132–140 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Kendon, E. J. Why extreme rains are gaining strength as the climate warms. Nature 563, 461–461 (2018).

Google Scholar

Westra, W. et al. Future changes to the intensity and frequency of short-duration extreme rainfall. Rev. Geophys. 52, 522–555 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Langner, J., Bergström, R. & Foltescu, V. Impact of climate change on surface ozone and deposition of sulphur and nitrogen in Europe. Atmos. Environ. 39, 1129–1141 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Simpson, D. et al. Impacts of climate and emission changes on nitrogen deposition in Europe: a multi-model study. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 6995–7017 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Kang, Y. et al. High-resolution ammonia emissions inventories in China from 1980 to 2012. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 2043–2058 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Bash, J. O., Cooter, E. J., Dennis, R. L., Walker, J. T. & Pleim, J. E. Evaluation of a regional air-quality model with bidirectional NH3 exchange coupled to an agroecosystem model. Biogeosciences 10, 1635–1645 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Sutton, M. A., Schjoerring, J. K. & Wyers, G. P. Plant-atmosphere exchange of ammonia. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 351, 261–278 (1995).

Google Scholar

Nair, A. A. & Yu, F. Quantification of atmospheric ammonia concentrations: a review of its measurement and modeling. Atmosphere 11, 1092 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Flechard, C. R. et al. Dry deposition of reactive nitrogen to European ecosystems: a comparison of inferential models across the NitroEurope network. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 2703–2728 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Tanner, E., Buchmann, N. & Eugster, W. Agricultural ammonia dry deposition and total nitrogen deposition to a Swiss mire. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 336, 108009 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Simpson, D. et al. The EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model—technical description. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 7825–7865 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Wu, Z. Y. et al. Evaluating the calculated dry deposition velocities of reactive nitrogen oxides and ozone from two community models over a temperate deciduous forest. Atmos. Environ. 45, 2663–2674 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Xiao, H. W. et al. δ15N–NH4+ variations of rainwater: application of the Rayleigh model. Atmos. Res. 157, 49–55 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

González, C. M. & Aristizábal, B. H. Acid rain and particulate matter dynamics in a mid-sized Andean city: The effect of rain intensity on ion scavenging. Atmos. Environ. 60, 164–171 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Pan, Y. P. et al. Wet deposition and scavenging ratio of air pollutants during an extreme rainstorm in the North China Plain. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett. 10, 348–353 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Andronache, C. Estimates of sulfate aerosol wet scavenging coefficient for locations in the Eastern United States. Atmos. Environ. 38, 795–804 (2004).

Article Google Scholar

Huo, M. et al. Chemical character of precipitation and related particles and trace gases in the North and South of China. J. Atmos. Chem. 67, 29–43 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Jylhä, K. Relationship between the scavenging coefficient for pollutants in precipitation and the radar reflectivity factor. Part I: derivation. J. Appl. Meteorol. 38, 1421–1434 (1999).

2.0.CO;2" data-track-action="article reference" href="https://doi.org/10.1175%2F1520-0450%281999%29038%3C1421%3ARBTSCF%3E2.0.CO%3B2" aria-label="Article reference 46" data-doi="10.1175/1520-0450(1999)0382.0.CO;2">Article Google Scholar

van der Does, M., Korte, L. F., Munday, C. I., Brummer, G. A. & Stuut, J. B. W. Particle size traces modern Saharan dust transport and deposition across the equatorial North Atlantic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 13697–13710 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Xu, D. et al. Multi-method determination of the below-cloud wet scavenging coefficients of aerosols in Beijing, China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 15569–15581 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Michelangeli, D. V. & Taylor, P. A. Numerical studies of aerosol scavenging by low-level, warm stratiform clouds and precipitation. Atmos. Environ. 38, 4653–4665 (2004).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, Y. et al. Disproportionate control on aerosol burden by light rain. Nat. Geosci. 14, 72–76 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

İlker, O. R. U. C., Akkoyunlu, B. O., Dogruel, M. & Tayanç, M. Chemical analysis of wet deposition sequential samples at Istanbul, Turkey. Int. J. Eng. Res. 10, 126–132 (2018).

Google Scholar

Lehmann, C. M., Bowersox, V. C. & Larson, S. M. Spatial and temporal trends of precipitation chemistry in the United States, 1985–2002. Environ. Pollut. 135, 347–361 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Zhao, Y. et al. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to China: a model analysis on nitrogen budget and critical load exceedance. Atmos. Environ. 153, 32–40 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, M. et al. Ammonia emission control in China would mitigate haze pollution and nitrogen deposition, but worsen acid rain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7760–7765 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Dennis, R. L., Mathur, R., Pleim, J. E. & Walker, J. T. Fate of ammonia emissions at the local to regional scale as simulated by the Community Multiscale Air Quality model. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 1, 207–214 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Garrido, J. L., González-Rouco, J. F., Vivanco, M. G. & Navarro, J. Regional surface temperature simulations over the Iberian Peninsula: Evaluation and climate projections. Clim. Dynam. 55, 3445–3468 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Sheppard, L. J. et al. Stress responses of Calluna vulgaris to reduced and oxidised N applied under ‘real world conditions’. Environ. Pollut. 154, 404–413 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Lamarque, J. F. et al. Global and regional evolution of short-lived radiatively-active gases and aerosols in the Representative Concentration Pathways. Clim. Change 109, 191–212 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Yu, F., Nair, A. A. & Luo, G. Long‐term trend of gaseous ammonia over the United States: modeling and comparison with observations. J. Geophys. Res. 123, 8315–8325 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Pinder, R. W., Adams, P. J. & Pandis, S. N. Ammonia emission controls as a cost-effective strategy for reducing atmospheric particulate matter in the eastern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 380–386 (2007). 2.

Article Google Scholar

Guo, Y. X. et al. Air quality, nitrogen use efficiency and food security in China are improved by cost-effective agricultural nitrogen management. Nat. Food 1, 648–658 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Trebs, I. et al. Dry and wet deposition of inorganic nitrogen compounds to a tropical pasture site (Rondônia, Brazil). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 447–469 (2006).

Article Google Scholar

Pleim, J. & Ran, L. Surface flux modeling for air quality applications. Atmosphere 2, 271–302 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Schoof, J. T. & Robeson, S. M. Projecting changes in regional temperature and precipitation extremes in the United States. Weather Clim. Extremes 11, 28–40 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, L. et al. Agricultural ammonia emissions in China: reconciling bottom-up and top-down estimates. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 339–355 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Leneman, H., Oudendag, D. A., Van der Hoek, K. W. & Janssen, P. H. M. Focus on emission factors: a sensitivity analysis of ammonia emission modelling in the Netherlands. Environ. Pollut. 102, 205–210 (1998).

Article Google Scholar

Xu, R. et al. Global ammonia emissions from synthetic nitrogen fertilizer applications in agricultural systems: empirical and process‐based estimates and uncertainty. Glob. Chang Biol. 25, 314–326 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Fowler, D. et al. Atmospheric composition change: ecosystems–atmosphere interactions. Atmos. Environ. 43, 5193–5267 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Flechard, C. R. et al. Advances in understanding, models and parameterizations of biosphere-atmosphere ammonia exchange. Biogeosciences 10, 5183–5225 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Flechard, C. R., Fowler, D., Sutton, M. A. & Cape, J. N. A dynamic chemical model of bi‐directional ammonia exchange between semi‐natural vegetation and the atmosphere. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125, 2611–2641 (1999).

Article Google Scholar

Nemitz, E., Milford, C. & Sutton, M. A. A two‐layer canopy compensation point model for describing bi‐directional biosphere‐atmosphere exchange of ammonia. Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 127, 815–833 (2001).

Article Google Scholar

Wen, Z. et al. Changes of nitrogen deposition in China during 1980 and 2018. Environ. Int. 144, 106022 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Sorteberg, A. & Hov, Ø. Two parametrizations of the dry deposition exchange for SO2 and NH3 in a numerical model. Atmos. Environ. 30, 1823–1840 (1996).

Article Google Scholar

Han, X., Zhang, M., Skorokhod, A. & Kou, X. X. Modeling dry deposition of reactive nitrogen in China with RAMS-CMAQ. Atmos. Environ. 166, 47–61 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Dennis, R. L. et al. Sensitivity of continental United States atmospheric budgets of oxidized and reduced nitrogen to dry deposition parameterizations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20130124 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Pleim, J. E., Bash, J. O., Walker, J. T. & Cooter, E. J. Development and evaluation of an ammonia bidirectional flux parameterization for air quality models. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 3794–3806 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Sutton, M. A. et al. Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20130166 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Wright, L. P. & Asman, W. A. H. Bi‐directional air‐surface exchange of atmospheric ammonia: a review of measurements and a development of a big‐leaf model for applications in regional‐scale air‐quality models. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D20310 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, X., Xu, W., Du, E. Z., Pan, Y. P. & Goulding, K. Reduced nitrogen dominated nitrogen deposition in the United States, but its contribution to nitrogen deposition in China decreased. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E3590–E3591 (2016).

Google Scholar

Du, E., de Vries, W., Galloway, J. N., Hu, X. Y. & Fang, J. Y. Changes in wet nitrogen deposition in the United States between 1985 and 2012. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 095004 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Wesely, M. L. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmos. Environ. 23, 1293–1304 (1989).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Gong, S., Padro, J. & Barrie, L. A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module. Atmos. Environ. 35, 549–560 (2001).

Article Google Scholar

Su, H. et al. Numerical simulation for dry deposition of ammonia and nitrogen dioxide in a small watershed in Jurong County of Jiangsu Province. Chin. J. Agrometeorol. 30, 335–342 (2009). (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Brook, J. R. A. & Vet, R. A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air–quality models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3, 2067–2082 (2003).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Wang, T. J., Hu, Z. Y. & Xu, C. K. Temporal variety and spatial distribution of dry deposition velocities of typical air pollutants over different landuse types. Clim. Environ. Res. 9, 591–604 (2004).

Google Scholar

Zhang, G., Zhang, J. & Liu, S. M. Characterization of nutrients in the atmospheric wet and dry deposition observed at the two monitoring sites over Yellow Sea and East China Sea. J. Atmos. Chem. 57, 41–57 (2007).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, L. et al. Dry deposition of individual nitrogen species at eight Canadian rural sites. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D02301 (2009).

Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Yu, Q., Ma, W. C. & Chen, L. M. Atmospheric deposition of inorganic nitrogen to the eastern China seas and its implications to marine biogeochemistry. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D00K10 (2010).

Google Scholar

Schiferl, L. D. et al. Interannual variability of ammonia concentrations over the United States: Sources and implications. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 12305–12328 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Download references

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42121004, 42230701, 41905086, 41905107, 42077205, and 41425020), the second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (2019QZKK0604), the Special Fund Project for Science and Technology Innovation Strategy of Guangdong Province (2019B121205004), the AirQuip (High-resolution Air Quality Information for Policy) Project funded by the Research Council of Norway, the Collaborative Innovation Center of Climate Change, Jiangsu Province, China, and the high-performance computing platform of Jinan University. The authors thank Dr. Huan Liu (Tsinghua University), Dr. Lin Zhang (Peking University), Dr. Sayantan Sarka (Indian Institute of Technology), and Dr. Padmaja Krishnan (National University of Singapore) for valuable suggestions and improvements to the paper. The authors would like to thank the four anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback.

These authors contributed equally: Weihua Chen, Shiguo Jia.

Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental Quality, Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, PR China

Weihua Chen, Xuemei Wang, Min Shao, Pengfei Yu, Ming Chang, Weiwen Wang & Jingying Mao

School of Atmospheric Sciences, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, PR China

Shiguo Jia

Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou, 510521, PR China

Wenhui Liao

Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA

Alex Guenther

INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1069 Sol Agro-hydrosysteme Spatialisation, 35042, Rennes, France

Chris Flechard

Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, PR China

Buqing Zhong

Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions of MOE, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, PR China

Xuejun Liu

College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, PR China

Guirui Yu

Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA

Gregory Carmichael

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

W.H.C., S.G.J., X.M.W., and M.S. conceived the study and led the analysis. W.H.L. helped with precipitation data processing. B.Q.Z., W.W.W., and J.Y.M. helped with emissions and ammonium deposition data processing. M.C. helped with the EMEP model simulation. C.F., A.G., P.F.Y., X.J.L., G.R.Y., and G.C. provided important views on the study. All co-authors contributed to improving the analysis and interpretation.

Correspondence to Xuemei Wang or Min Shao.

The authors declare no competing interests s as defined by Nature Research, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the interpretation of the article.

Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Chen, W., Jia, S., Wang, X. et al. Precipitation trend increases the contribution of dry reduced nitrogen deposition. npj Clim Atmos Sci 6, 62 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00390-7

Download citation

Received: 06 July 2022

Accepted: 25 May 2023

Published: 07 June 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00390-7

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative